Getting your case ready

Getting your case ready

If the parties cannot reach an agreement through mediation, the case will go to a hearing. Now is the time to get your evidence, which can be:

  • Documents 
  • Pictures
  • Oral (spoken) testimony given by a witness under oath at the hearing
  • Written statements such as a sworn affidavit
  • Expert evidence from someone with special knowledge who can help the Tribunal

Another part of getting your case ready is reading past Tribunal and court decisions with similar facts and issues to yours. This can help you learn about what your hearing will be like. It will also help you make arguments in your case. Find out how to search for Tribunal and court decisions here

What is case management?

“Case management” is the Tribunal working with the parties as they get their case ready for a hearing. 

The Tribunal has a mandate to move complaints to a conclusion in a way that is fast, fair and informal. The goal of case management is to reduce the time required for the hearing itself and to help the parties organize their evidence. 

We expect all parties to be active, efficient and reasonable in the case management process. Everyone benefits when we can reduce the time needed for the hearing.  

Documents from the Canadian Human Rights Commission

At the beginning of the case management process, the Canadian Human Rights Commission (the “Commission”) will send everyone a list of documents. These are documents from the original complaint that could be relevant to the case before the Tribunal.

Case management calls

The Tribunal will organize case management calls that include all of the parties. These calls will take place by phone or video. The Tribunal Member assigned to your case will attend, along with the registry officer. If you have a representative, they can attend on your behalf, or you can both attend.

During the call, the Tribunal Member will encourage you to find areas where you agree on the facts. They will work with you to resolve various issues and disagreements. If the parties can work together during case management, the hearing will be shorter and simpler. 

Any party can request a case management meeting at any time. 

You will receive a summary of the case management call from the Tribunal afterwards. 

Have your calendar handy

The Tribunal Member will set deadlines and schedules.  When the Tribunal requests information by a specific date, you must meet the deadline. You will also need your calendar to schedule the next call or hearing dates. 

What do I call the Tribunal Member?

The Tribunal Member will likely talk to you about this as you are getting started. Usually, you address them as “Member [Last Name]”. 

Preparing your Statement of Particulars

What is a “Statement of Particulars”?

The Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure require you to prepare a Statement of Particulars. This is an outline of how you intend to present your case at the Tribunal hearing. 

You will receive a letter from the Tribunal with deadlines for when each party must submit their Statement of Particulars. If you need more time, please contact your registry officer.

You will be sharing your Statement of Particulars with the other parties and the Tribunal. This exchange of information and documents is called “disclosure”. 

Disclosure happens in four stages:

  1. The Complainant’s statement goes out first. 
  2. Then, the Commission may also prepare a statement. 
  3. The Respondent addresses what the Complainant has said in their own statement. 
  4. The other parties then have a chance to “Reply” or comment on what the Respondent has said. 

What should you include in your Statement of Particulars?

The Statement of Particulars must have these five sections:

  1. Facts – your version of what happened
  2. Legal issues – the type of discrimination you believe happened
  3. Remedies – what you want to happen when the Tribunal makes its decision
  4. Lists of documents – a list of all documents that might be relevant to your case and a separate list of documents you will keep private
  5. List of witnesses – names of those you will call to testify and what you think they will say

1. Facts

Under this heading, give your version of the events that led to the complaint. Describe what happened by answering the following questions: 

  • Who was involved?
  • What actions were taken?
  • When did it happen?
  • Where did it happen?
  • How were you discriminated against?

 Number each paragraph. This makes it easy for the other side to refer to your points when they respond.

Instructions for complainants

It is easier to understand what happened when you describe events in the order that they occurred. Look at these examples of a complainant’s statement of facts. The Respondent will read your statement of facts and respond to it.

Instructions for respondents

Review the Complainant’s Statement of Particulars. Under the Facts heading, note what you agree with and what you disagree with. Add information you have about what happened and why. 

Look at these examples of how a respondent might tell their side of the story.

2. Legal issues 

The Canadian Human Rights Act (the “Act”) sets out the grounds on which Canadians must not discriminate against each other. For example, sex, race and disability are prohibited grounds of discrimination. In this part of your Statement of Particulars, you will make arguments about how the Act applies to what happened.

Instructions for complainants

First, you must explain why you believe a prohibited ground of discrimination was a factor in what happened to you.

Next, describe how the treatment you received affected you. For example:

  • You may have had hurt feelings or felt a loss of dignity.
  • You may have lost money or income.
  • Your emotional or mental health may have suffered.
  • You may have lost an employment opportunity.

 

Some complainants believe they were victims of retaliation (job loss, reduction of work hours, harassment, etc.)or punishment because they filed a complaint. If this applies to you, then you must describe the retaliatory actions. You must show how they are linked to the filing of your original complaint.

 

Number each paragraph. This makes it easy for the other side to refer to your points when they respond.

Look at these examples of how complainants describe the legal issues in their case.

Instructions for respondents

There are two different ways you can respond to the Complainant’s legal issues:

  1. You may want to argue that no discrimination took place. You should explain why you believe this.
  2. You may want to make a “statutory defence”. Section 15 of the Canadian Human Rights Act lists certain situations where a person may be treated differently, but it is not discrimination. For example, it is not a discrimination in these situations:
    • There is a bona fide (good faith) reason why you were not able to offer the same goods, services, facilities or accommodation to the Complainant as you would to anyone else.
    • There is a bona fide (good faith) job requirement that excludes the Complainant for reasons such as health and safety.
    • There is a legal minimum or maximum age limit for a job.
    • Your workplace grants special leave or benefits for pregnancy, childbirth or childcare.

If you wish to make a statutory defence, you should explain which situation applies to you.

Look at these examples of responses to the legal issues raised by complainants.

3. Remedies

If the Tribunal finds that discrimination took place, it can make an “order” against the Respondent, that is the person or organization that discriminated. Orders are intended to “remedy” or help fix the harm that the discrimination caused to its victim. The Act lists these remedies in section 53.

What the Tribunal can order someone to do:

  • Stop the discrimination and take measures to prevent it from happening again.
  • Give the victim the rights, opportunities or privileges that were denied.
  • Pay the victim wages lost because of the discrimination.
  • Compensate the victim for the cost of finding alternatives to goods, services, facilities or accommodation that were denied because of discrimination.
  • Pay the victim up to $20,000 for pain and suffering caused by the discrimination.
  • Pay the victim up to $20,000 if the discrimination was “wilful or reckless”.
  • Pay interest on financial compensation ordered by the Tribunal.

The Tribunal cannot award legal costs

If you hired someone to represent you, and the Tribunal rules in your favour, it cannot order the other side to pay your legal costs. 

Instructions for complainants

In this section of your Statement of Particulars, outline the remedies you want. If you are asking for money, give details to justify the amount you are asking for. Here are some details you could give:

Lost wages
  • Start and end dates you were employed.
  • Start and end dates you were unemployed.
  • What you were earning when employed.
  • Amount of Employment Insurance (EI) or other income, such as disability benefits, that you received while not employed.
  • Supporting documents such as pay stubs, T4s, tax returns and Canada Revenue Agency Notices of Assessment.
Cost of finding alternatives to goods, services, facilities or accommodation
  • Did you incur expenses while you were finding an alternative?
  • Did you have to pay more for the alternative? If so, how much?
  • Provide supporting documents such as receipts and invoices.
Pain and suffering
  • This amount cannot exceed $20,000.
  • Explain the nature of your pain and suffering.
  • Provide supporting documents such as doctor’s letters and receipts for treatment.
Compensation for “wilful or reckless” discrimination
  • This amount cannot exceed $20,000.
  • Explain why you believe that the person knew they were discriminating against you and did so on purpose.
  • Provide supporting documents such as emails.
Interest on financial compensation
  • If the Tribunal orders interest, it is usually simple interest. It is calculated yearly at the rate set by the Bank of Canada.
  • In most cases, the amount collects interest from the date when the discrimination took place to the date the compensation is paid.  
  • If you believe another rate or period is appropriate, please explain why.
  • Provide any supporting documents.

Look at these examples of complainants’ requests for remedies.

Instructions for respondents

Most respondents deny that any discrimination took place. If you are the Respondent, your first response may be to oppose any remedy asked by the Complainant.

Even if you deny that discrimination took place, it is important to provide alternative remedies in case the Tribunal finds in favour of the Complainant. The Tribunal needs to craft remedies on a fair and informed basis, so propose other remedies. If not, the Tribunal may award remedies based only on the Complainant’s requests.

Look at these examples of respondents’ positions on remedies requested.

4. Lists of documents

During pre-hearing disclosure, sharing documents helps the parties understand each other’s position. 

In your Statement of Particulars, make two lists—a list of documents you will share and a separate list of documents you will keep private.

1.  List of documents for disclosure (non-priveleged)

List all of the documents that could be relevant to your case. Be sure to include any documents that you originally shared with the Commission. You will be sending new copies of each document to the other parties along with your Statement of Particulars. 

If you are not sure if a document is relevant, list it anyway. If a document is not on the list, you may not be able to use it at the hearing. 

To note: A document only becomes evidence when you present it at the hearing and it is admitted as evidence.

2. List of “privileged” documents

List the documents related to your case that you will not be sharing with the other parties. These are called “privileged” documents. They include:

  • any communication about the complaint between you and your lawyer or other representative
  • any notes you have prepared for the upcoming hearing
  • any communication during mediation or about a settlement 

Look at these examples of document lists.

5. List of witnesses 

Witnesses are the people who can help you prove a point related to your case. Prepare a list of all the witnesses you would like to testify at the hearing. If a witness is not on your list, they may not be allowed to testify.

For each witness, prepare a summary of what you think they will say at the hearing. Complainants and respondents are usually important witnesses at the hearing, so be sure to include a brief summary of what you will say.

Look at these examples of witness lists and summaries.

How to send documents to the other parties and the Tribunal

Who gets what

Once you have finished preparing your documents, following your steps: 

  1. Send these documents to the Tribunal:
    • your Statement of Particulars
    • your list of documents
    • your list of witness and the summaries of their testimonies
  2. Send these documents to the other parties: 
    • your Statement of Particulars
    • your list of documents
    • your list of witness and the summaries of their testimonies
    • copies of your non-privileged documents

Do not send anyone your privileged documents. 

If you later find another document that you consider relevant, follow these steps: 

  1. Update your list of documents.
  2. Send the updated list and a copy of the document to the other parties.
  3. Send the updated list to the Tribunal. 

Do not send copies of your documents to the Tribunal yet. We will tell you when to send them. 

“Serving” documents to the other parties

“Serving” is the legal term for giving the other parties copies of your documents. The Tribunal’s Rules allow you to serve most documents by email.

These options are also allowed:

  • Regular mail (keep a record of when you mailed it)
  • In person (ask for a receipt)
  • Registered mail (keep your receipt)
  • Fax, if the document is 20 pages or less (keep a fax printout of the transmission)
  • Courier (keep your receipt)
  • “Bailiffs” or “process servers”: These are people who are trained to serve documents. They should give you an “affidavit” or “certificate” of service.

Proving that you served a document

If one of the other parties says they did not get a document, you will have to prove that you sent it. Here are some examples of proof:

  • The “sent” copy of an email
  • A printout record of a fax transmission
  • A registered mail receipt or courier’s receipt
  • An “affidavit” or “certificate” of service from a bailiff or process server

Filing a document with the Tribunal

“Filing” is the term used for submitting a document to the Tribunal.

In most cases, the Tribunal will ask the parties to file documents by email using this address: registry.office@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca.

You can also file documents with the Tribunal’s Registry Office:

  • in person
  • by courier
  • by mail 
  • by fax

Replying to the Respondent’s Statement of Particulars

Complainants and the Commission can make a written “Reply” to the Respondent’s Statement of Particulars. It is important to do this if the Respondent raised new issues that you need to address.

Your reply should only address the new issues. Do not repeat everything you said in your Statement of Particulars. 

For guidance, see examples of a Reply in the respondent's Statement of Particulars. 

I have a new document in support of my Reply: what should I do?

You may have new documents that support your Reply.

  1. List the new documents in your Reply.
  2. Update the list of documents in your Statement of Particulars. 
  3. Send the updated list and the copy of the document to the other parties.
  4. Send the updated list to the Tribunal.

Do not send copies to the Tribunal yet.

Look at these examples of what complainants put in their Reply.

Making an Agreed Statement of Facts

People come to the Tribunal because they do not agree with one another. But very often, there are many details that are not in dispute. An Agreed Statement of Facts is a list of things that all the parties agree on. You file it with the Tribunal.

An Agreed Statement of Facts will save time during the hearing. You do not need to present evidence on facts that everyone agrees on. Once all the parties have exchanged their Statements of Particulars, they should each compare them. Look for areas where another party seems to agree or might agree about a fact. The Tribunal Member will encourage you to contact the other parties and discuss these areas.

For example, the parties might agree that the Complainant was fired on a certain date. Or they might agree on the amount of money the Complainant would have earned if they had not been fired. 

You can file an Agreed Statement of Facts with the Tribunal at any time, up to and including the start of the hearing.

Expert witnesses

An “expert” witness is a professional who has knowledge that could help the Tribunal with a technical issue. They are not on anyone’s side. For example, a doctor might testify about a medical condition. An accountant might give evidence about loss of income. 

The Tribunal does not require expert witnesses, but any of the parties can call one. Expert witnesses often charge a fee. The party who calls the expert witness has to pay them, even if they win the case. 

Preparing an expert witness report

Sometimes expert witnesses testify at the hearing. Whether they attend the hearing or not, the expert must prepare an “expert witness report”. 

The report contains a detailed explanation of the expert's opinion. The report should include:

  • Expert’s name, address and resumé
  • An explanation of how the expert’s education and experience qualifies them to testify
  • Details of what they will say and the facts they rely on
  • Signature of the expert 

Sending the expert witness report

You must send the report to the Tribunal and the other parties. The Tribunal will set the deadlines to serve and file expert reports.

Resolving other issues before the hearing

Sometimes when the parties are getting ready for a hearing, they disagree on issues other than the complaint itself. Here are some examples:

  • One party thinks that the other party has more to disclose.
  • The Complainant wishes to change something in their complaint.
  • One of the parties wants to add more parties to the case. For example, the Complainant might want to add another respondent. 
  • A party might move to have two or more related complaints heard at the same time. 

Resolving issues informally

You and the other parties can try to resolve such issues yourselves. If that does not work, ask for a case management call with the Tribunal Member as soon as you can. Often, the Member can help you sort things out informally. This is the easiest and quickest way. 

Filing a motion

If the issue cannot be resolved informally, you may have to ask the Tribunal to decide on the matter. This request is called a “motion”.

If you decide to file a motion, the case will take longer to get to a final decision. That is because each party must have a chance to present arguments on the motion, in writing or in a conference call. After that, you can expect to wait up to three months for the Tribunal’s decision. If it is going to take longer, the Member will write to the parties to explain this.

Checklist for getting your case ready

Use this checklist to make sure you have completed the steps for getting your case ready.

Watch the following video to learn more about the Tribunal’s case management process. 

Be advised that certain information referenced in the following video is outdated. Please follow our Guide for accurate information regarding the Tribunal’s process. 


 

Video 3 - Pre-Hearing Case Management

Video 3 - Pre-Hearing Case Management - Transcript

Hi. I'm Lisa.

When my complaint of discrimination was referred to the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, I agreed to participate in a confidential mediation to try to resolve the complaint.

When mediation was unsuccessful, the complaint was sent to a hearing.

But before that could happen, there was something called pre-hearing case management.

I didn't have a lawyer, or anyone to help me so I wasn't sure what would happen during case management.

Hi, I'm Philip, and I'm a Registry Officer with the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal.

During pre-hearing case management, the Tribunal helps the parties prepare for the upcoming hearing of a complaint.

This is usually done by a conference call.

I was a little confused about how to prepare for the call.

Understanding some of the terminology was the first step.

There's something called a Statement of Particulars that has to be sent to the Registry Officer before the conference call.

All parties have to complete one.

It's a description of how you plan to prove your case at the hearing.

A Statement of Particulars has five parts.

First, is the statement of facts.

This is your version of the events that led to the complaint.

The second part includes the legal issues, information about what type of discrimination happened and how it was connected to one or more of the types of discrimination listed in the Canadian Human Rights Act.

Like did it have something to do with your race, religion or age?

Also, how did the treatment affect you?

The third part of the Statement of Particulars is the remedy you're asking for.

The fourth part is your list of documents.

This includes all the documents you have that relate to the case.

The process of exchanging this information is called disclosure.

Fifth is your list of witnesses who are the people you'd like to call to testify at the hearing and a summary of what each witness will testify about.

Disclosure helps all of the parties avoid surprises at the hearing by ensuring everyone knows the evidence and arguments that will be given by the other parties.

Once the Registry Officer receives each party's Statement of Particulars, you'll receive an email letting you know the name of the Tribunal Member hearing your case.

This email will also ask you about your availability for the conference call.

These calls usually last less than an hour.

Once the date for the conference call was set, I received an email with a dial-in phone number and conference ID that I used to join the call.

It was really easy.

The email also included an agenda that helped me prepare for the conference call.

Ahead of the call, I made sure that I knew the dates I was free for the hearing and where I wanted it to take place.

At the start of the conference call, the Registry Officer introduced himself and made sure all the parties were on the line.

The Tribunal Member joined the conference and the Registry Officer began recording the call.

Good afternoon, everyone.

You have all received an agenda for this teleconference and I've reviewed each party's Statement of Particulars.

Before we go further, I would like to invite both parties to ask questions if I say anything you don't understand.

Also, as your hearing is public, let me know if any documents you submit need to remain confidential. Shall we proceed?

The member then asked both parties about the information in each of our Statement of Particulars.

She confirmed the number of witnesses, and asked if either of us had any expert witnesses like a doctor or an accountant.

We both told her we did not.

Then the member asked if we'd like to come up with an agreed statement of facts.

She said it wasn't mandatory, but it would be helpful if we agreed on what happened so they wouldn't have to hear evidence at the hearing.

We said we'd definitely discuss the idea further.

Now can I get everyone to take a look at their calendars.

It was time to talk about scheduling the hearing, but I had no idea how long hearings usually last.

She told me they average five business days and we can always book more time if we need it.

Then we talked about the location of the hearing.

I live in Guelph and I wanted the hearing to be here, but the respondent said all of his witnesses live in Toronto.

The member said that a hearing normally takes place wherever the incident happened, so she made the decision to hold it in Guelph.

Fortunately, the respondent didn't object and the location was set.

After the conference call, the Registry Officer sent me a short summary of the decisions and the Member's instructions from the call.

I also received a Notice of Hearing letter that included the dates, time, and location of the hearing.

After the conference call, I was feeling a lot more confident.

Before the hearing, I confirmed the hearing date and time with my witnesses, and I kept working on how I was going to present my case.

I made sure I was ready for my hearing.

To find out more about pre-hearing case management, please visit the CHRT website, and be sure to watch our other videos on the preliminary process, mediation and hearings.